MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117952450 · doi:10.1089/scd.2013.0646

Prosurvival Factors Derived from the Embryonic Brain Promote Adult Neural Stem Cell Survival

2014· article· en· W2117952450 on OpenAlexafffund
Nadia Sachewsky, Cindi M. Morshead

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cells and Development · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsEmbryonic stem cellBiologyNeural stem cellCell biologyStem cellDownregulation and upregulationAdult stem cellStromal cellCellNitric oxideEndocrinologyCancer researchBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporally distinct populations of neural stem cells (NSCs; embryonic and adult) display the cardinal stem cell properties of self-renewal and multipotentiality; however, their relative frequency and cell kinetics vary through development and into old age. We asked whether changes in NSC behavior could be accounted for by changes in environmental signals over time. We identified a prosurvival signaling cascade that enhances adult-derived NSC survival using cues released from embryonic neurons. Specifically, we demonstrate that stromal-cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α) released by embryonic neurons leads to upregulation of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in adult neural precursor cells. The resulting increase in nitric oxide leads to the upregulation of the stem cell factor (SCF) receptor ckit on adult NSCs (ANSCs). SCF released from embryonic neurons results in enhanced NSC survival. Using both in vitro and in vivo assays, we have demonstrated expansion of the size of the NSC pool through this pathway, indicating that ANSCs retain their ability to respond to embryonic-derived cues into adulthood.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cells and DevelopmentSame topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsFrench-language works237,207