MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118025229 · doi:10.2514/6.2010-4629

Aerodynamic Characterization of a NACA 0018 Airfoil at Low Reynolds Numbers

2010· article· en· W2118025229 on OpenAlexafffund
Ryan Gerakopulos, Michael S. H. Boutilier, Serhiy Yarusevych

Bibliographic record

Venue40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAirfoilAerodynamicsNACA airfoilReynolds numberCharacterization (materials science)Computer sciencePhysicsMechanicsTurbulenceOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3to 200x10 3 and angles of attack from 0° to 18°. These data were used to characterize the separation bubble and determine lift coefficients. From these results, two distinct regions in the lift curves can be identified: a region of rapid and linear growth of the lift coefficients at low angles of attack and a region of more gradual and linear growth at higher pre-stall angles. Furthermore, the slope of the lift curve in each region is found to be linked to the rates of change in separation, transition, and reattachment locations with the angle of attack. These findings are substantiated by an analysis of the available experimental data for a NACA 0012 airfoil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue40th Fluid Dynamics Conference and ExhibitSame topicFluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFrench-language works237,207