MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118053668 · doi:10.1135/cccc2009544

Refrigeration cycle design for refrigerant mixtures by molecular simulation

2010· article· en· W2118053668 on OpenAlexaff
William R. Smith, Magda Francová, Marian Kowalski, Ivó Nezbeda

Bibliographic record

VenueCollection of Czechoslovak Chemical Communications · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantDew pointBubble pointThermodynamicsRefrigerationVapor-compression refrigerationDewComponent (thermodynamics)Work (physics)Equation of stateBoiling pointChemistryBubbleProcess engineeringGas compressorMechanicsCondensationEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a molecular simulation methodology to calculate the properties of a vapor-compression refrigeration cycle and its Coefficient of Performance, in the case when the refrigerant is a mixture. The methodology requires only a molecular force-field model for each refrigerant pure component and, for improved accuracy, an expression for the vapor pressure of each pure component as a function of temperature. Both may be constructed by means of theoretical approaches in combination with minimal amounts of experimental data, and the latter may also be estimated by empirical formulae with reasonable accuracy. The approach involves a combination of several available molecular-level computer simulation techniques for the individual processes of the cycle. This work extends our earlier study to cases when the refrigerant is a pure fluid. The mixture refrigerant simulations entail the calculation of bubble- and dew-point curves for the refrigerant mixtures, and we propose a new approach for dew-point calculations via molecular simulation. We compare results for a test case with those obtained from the Equation-of-State model used in the standard REFPROP software and with experimental data for a commercially available refrigerant mixture of R32 (CH 2 F 2 ) and R143a (CH 2 FCF 3 ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score0.616

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCollection of Czechoslovak Chemical CommunicationsSame topicPhase Equilibria and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207