MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118071046 · doi:10.3103/s1068375511040028

Magnetic models of cast amorphous microwires

2011· article· en· W2118071046 on OpenAlex
С. А. Баранов

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Engineering and Applied Electrochemistry · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmorphous solidMagnetostrictionCoercivityCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceHysteresisRelaxation (psychology)Magnitude (astronomy)Amorphous metalMagnetic domainRectangleMagnetic hysteresisDomain wall (magnetism)MagnetizationMagnetic fieldPhysicsChemistryCrystallographyGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A theory of a magnetic domain model for glass-coated amorphous microwires is studied. The obtained theoretical results are confirmed by experiments. Cast glass-coated amorphous microwires with positive magnetostriction have a rectangle hysteresis loop, which is characterized by a coercive-force stable magnitude. The coercive-force magnitude and the fluctuations of this magnitude are of theoretical and practical interest. The theory of the relaxation mechanism of magnetic reversal is constructed. For the more precise comparison of the theory and the experiment, a series of experimental measurements is needed, which are also discussed in the paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it