MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118082742 · doi:10.1109/tsp.2005.861785

Cross-Layer optimal connection admission control for variable bit rate multimedia traffic in packet wireless CDMA networks

2006· article· en· W2118082742 on OpenAlexaff
F. Richard Yu, Vikram Krishnamurthy, Victor C. M. Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkQuality of serviceCall Admission ControlNetwork packetWireless networkCode division multiple accessAdmission controlMarkov processWirelessTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Next generation wireless code division multiple access (CDMA) networks are required to support packet multimedia traffic. This paper addresses the connection admission control problem for multiservice packet traffic modeled as Markov modulated Poisson process (MMPP) with the quality of service (QoS) requirements on both physical layer signal-to-interference ratio (SIR) and network layer blocking probability. Optimal linear-programming-based algorithms are presented that take into account of SIR outage probability constraints. By exploiting the MMPP traffic models and introducing a small SIR outage probability, the proposed algorithms can dramatically improve the network utilization. In addition, we propose two reduced complexity algorithms that require less computation and can have satisfactory approximation to the optimal solutions. Numerical examples illustrating the performance of the proposed schemes are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Signal ProcessingSame topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207