MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118115450 · doi:10.1007/s00445-015-0935-x

MeMoVolc consensual document: a review of cross-disciplinary approaches to characterizing small explosive magmatic eruptions

2015· review· en· W2118115450 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia Gurioli, Daniele Andronico, Patrick Bachèlery, Hélène Balcone‐Boissard, Jean Battaglia, Georges Boudon, Alain Burgisser, Mike Burton, K. V. Cashman, Sarah B. Cichy, Raffaello Cioni, Andréa Di Muro, Lucía Dominguez, Claudia D’Oriano, T. H. Druitt, Andrew Harris, Matthias Hort, Karim Kelfoun, Jean‐Christophe Komorowski, Ulrich Kueppers, Jean‐Luc Le Pennec, T. Menand, Raphaël Paris, L. Pioli, Marco Pistolesi, Margherita Polacci, Massimo Pompilio, Maurizio Ripepe, Olivier Roche, Estelle F. Rose Koga, A. Rust, Federica Schiavi, L. Scharff, Roberto Sulpizio, Jacopo Taddeucci, T. Thórdarson

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Volcanology · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsDisciplineVolcanoComputer scienceEarth scienceData scienceGeologyLibrary sciencePolitical scienceSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.113 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of VolcanologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207