MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118134573 · doi:10.1109/memea.2010.5480203

Context-aware physiological data acquisition and processing with wireless sensor networks

2010· article· en· W2118134573 on OpenAlexaff
M. Marzencki, Benny Hung, Peng Lin, Yifeng Huang, T. Cho, Y. Chuo, Bożena Kamińska

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWearable computerComputer scienceWireless sensor networkScalabilityContext (archaeology)WirelessWearable technologyKey distribution in wireless sensor networksReal-time computingBase stationEmbedded systemBody area networkInterface (matter)Wireless networkComputer networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wearable devices are a novel method for sensing physiological parameters of subjects. Even though some of them are equipped with multiple sensors, usually each parameter is analyzed separately. It often leads to false alarm generation and thus limited acceptability of these systems. We propose not only to combine multi-sensor data available on the wearable device, but also to interface the wearable nodes with a mesh network of sensing devices deployed in the environment. Such solution enables context-sensitive analysis of the physiological data leading to correct situation assessment and reliable alarm generation. The wireless sensor network provides reliable and low power communication medium for the wearable devices. We base our system on ECG and acceleration data acquired by the wearable nodes along with descriptive localization and environmental data from the wireless sensor network. We present the architecture of the proposed system and an example implementation both indoors and outdoors. The proposed system is easy to implement, flexible and scalable which makes it suitable for large area deployments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Efficient Wireless Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207