MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118159900 · doi:10.1109/whc.2009.4810839

Robust perception-based data reduction and transmission in telehaptic systems

2009· article· en· W2118159900 on OpenAlexaff
Nizar Sakr, Jilin Zhou, Nicolas D. Georganas, Jiying Zhao, Emil M. Petriu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTeleoperation and Haptic Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaptic technologyComputer scienceNetwork packetReduction (mathematics)Haptic perceptionPerceptionTransmission (telecommunications)Data transmissionReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, two robust perception-based haptic data reduction and transmission techniques are presented to reduce data traffic in telehaptic systems. A prediction approach that relies on the least-squares method and median filtering is exploited in order to reduce the number of packets transmitted, and efficiently reconstruct unsuccessfully received data samples. Knowledge from human haptic perception is also used and incorporated into the general data reduction architecture. The techniques are initially evaluated in a basic experimental setting in order to validate their performance. Their application in a haptic-enabled telementoring surgery simulation is also demonstrated. The experimental results prove the proposed approach's effectiveness as haptic data packets can be reduced by as much as 96% in normal network conditions and up to 93% in the presence of significant communication delay and packet loss, while preserving the overall quality of the telehaptic environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeleoperation and Haptic SystemsFrench-language works237,207