MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118164039 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2008.ecp.101

Proposal and Analysis of Region-Based Location Service Management Protocol for VANETs

2008· preprint· en· W2118164039 on OpenAlexaff
Hanan Saleet, Rami Langar, Otman Basir, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityVehicular ad hoc networkOverhead (engineering)Protocol (science)Computer networkWireless ad hoc networkLocalityScheme (mathematics)Distributed computingService (business)Key (lock)Computer securityTelecommunicationsWirelessDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the major challenges for vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) is related to efficient location management issue. In this paper, we propose a new region-based location service management protocol (RLSMP) that uses mobility patterns as means to synthesize vehicle movement and thus can be used in VANETs applications. One of the key distinguishing features of our solution from existing literature is its scalability since it uses message aggregation in both updating and querying, and promises locality awareness as well as minimum signaling overhead. To evaluate the efficiency of our proposal, we compare our scheme with existing solutions using both analytical and simulation approaches. To achieve this, we develop analytical models to evaluate the location updates cost. Numerical and simulation results show that our protocol scales better than existing schemes, when increasing the size of VANET which enhances the feasibility of such large scale ad hoc networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.451
Threshold uncertainty score0.780

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207