MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118185184 · doi:10.37543/oceanides.v30i1.145

Benthic diatoms from shallow environments deposited at 300 m depth in a southern Gulf of California basin.

2015· article· en· W2118185184 on OpenAlexaff
H. Rochí­n -Bañaga, David Alfaro Siqueiros Beltrones, Jörg Bollmann

Bibliographic record

VenueCICIMAR Oceánides · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBenthic zoneBayDiatomOceanographySedimentIntertidal zoneTaxonNitzschiaBenthic habitatMangroveNaviculaBiologyEcologyEnvironmental scienceGeologyPaleontologyPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Benthic diatoms collected with a Technicap model PPS-3/3 trap with an aperture of 0.125 m2 were recorded, which consists of a programmable carousel motorized with twelve 250 mL bottles installed at 300 m deep in Cuenca Alfonso, Bahía de La Paz. The hypothesis that diatoms deposited in the trap sediment would be related to mangrove environments from the Bay of La Paz. Thus, in order to identify the benthic diatoms and infer their origin, a sample for the period December 2011 to January 2012. The identification was made from images taken with a Zeiss Supra Vp55 scanning electron microscope. I know identified 38 diatom taxa, 32 of which were benthic forms including the species: Actinoptychus vulgaris, Halamphora coffeaeformis, Delphineis surirella, Fragilariopsis doliolus and Nitzschia amabilis. What these, the observed diatoms correspond mainly to benthic taxa commonly represented in habitats of shallow intertidal and subtidal zones. Although the hypo- thesis was supported, the species composition of diatoms it did not allow greater precision on the environment of origin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCICIMAR OceánidesSame topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207