Granulocytosis and increased adhesion molecules after resistive loading of the diaphragm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Upregulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules, followed by an influx of granulocytes and macrophages, can contribute to exertion-induced skeletal muscle injury. The purpose of this study was to quantify circulating leukocyte subsets, diaphragm injury and infiltrating leukocyte subsets, and surface expression of vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 in the diaphragm after inspiratory resistive loading (IRL). Eight New Zealand white rabbits underwent 1.5 h of IRL and seven control rabbits underwent a sham procedure. Blood samples, taken at baseline and 2, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after the onset of IRL or sham, showed that band cell counts had increased at 6 h post-IRL. Point counting of haematoxylin and eosin-stained cross-sections, sampled at 72 h post-IRL, showed greater injury in diaphragms from IRL rabbits compared with controls. Immunohistochemical processing showed increased expression of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1, and higher granulocyte and macrophage counts in IRL diaphragms than control diaphragms. Macrophages were the predominant inflammatory cells. Increased intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression, and infiltration of granulocytes and macrophages may contribute to inspiratory resistive loading-induced diaphragm injury.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".