MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118201869 · doi:10.1109/23.958766

DAQ system for LEPS experiment

2001· article· en· W2118201869 on OpenAlexaff
Y. Sugaya, J. K. Ahn, H. Akimune, Y. Asano, W. C. Chang, S. Daté, M̄. Fujiwara, K. Hicks, T. Hotta, K. Imai, T. Ishikawa, T. Iwata, H. Kawai, Z.Y. Kim, Yuki Kishimoto, N. Kumagai, Shoji Makino, N. Matsukoka, T. Matsumura, T. Mibe, S. Minami, M. Miyabe, Y. Miyachi, T. Nakano, M. Nomachi, Yoji Ohashi, T. Ooba, C. Rangacharylu, A. Sakaguchi, T. Sasaki, Daikichi Seki, Hideo Shimizu, M. Sumihama, H. Toki, T. Toyama, H. Toyokawa, A. Wakai, C.W. Wang, W.C. Wang, T. Yonehara, T. Yorita, M. Yosoi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData acquisitionVMEbusComputer hardwareNuclear electronicsEthernetModularity (biology)ScalabilityComputer Automated Measurement and ControlComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A data acquisition (DAQ) system for experiments with the Laser Electron Photons at SPring-8 (LEPS) has been developed based on network distributed architecture. The system is designed so as to transfer digitized data with a 1-kHz trigger rate from various front-end electronics. Four local DAQ systems with VME board computers at the front end play a role to provide modularity, scalability, and flexibility. Data from each local DAQ system are sent through fast Ethernet to the data server. With this DAQ system, experiments to measure /spl phi/ photoproduction at LEPS started on May 2000. Signals from scintillation counters, drift chambers, and silicon strip detectors were successfully stored on disk. The performance of the present DAQ system is found to be good enough for the measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1250.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear ScienceSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207