MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118201869 · doi:10.1109/23.958766

DAQ system for LEPS experiment

2001· article· en· W2118201869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData acquisitionVMEbusComputer hardwareNuclear electronicsEthernetModularity (biology)ScalabilityComputer Automated Measurement and ControlComputer sciencePhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A data acquisition (DAQ) system for experiments with the Laser Electron Photons at SPring-8 (LEPS) has been developed based on network distributed architecture. The system is designed so as to transfer digitized data with a 1-kHz trigger rate from various front-end electronics. Four local DAQ systems with VME board computers at the front end play a role to provide modularity, scalability, and flexibility. Data from each local DAQ system are sent through fast Ethernet to the data server. With this DAQ system, experiments to measure /spl phi/ photoproduction at LEPS started on May 2000. Signals from scintillation counters, drift chambers, and silicon strip detectors were successfully stored on disk. The performance of the present DAQ system is found to be good enough for the measurement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.308
Threshold uncertainty score0.429

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it