Protean Career Development: Exploring the Individuals, Organizational and Job-related Factors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to dynamics on both external and internal business environments, new forms of career management andcareer progression are increasingly being adopted at the individual level to maximize career success. Employeesare now more inclined to setup their own career agendas and establish benchmarks in measuring career successin a new trend as emphasized in protean career. Based on the SCCT and JCM models, the study provides atheoretical framework that examines the predictive potential of the individual, organizational and job-relatedfactors in explaining protean career among professional employees. The study is exploratory on the grounds ofliterature review. Professional employees may gain insights of the importance of protean career in careerdevelopment process. Practical interventions for HRD professionals are suggested to assist individuals andorganisations towards protean career management. Future research could provide a more holistic view of proteancareer and develop additional propositions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it