MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118286408 · doi:10.1109/radar.2005.1435918

Pre-filtering for clutter rejection in beamspace STAP

2005· article· en· W2118286408 on OpenAlexaff
M. Khanpour-Ardestani, Raviraj Adve, Michael C. Wicks

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClutterSpace-time adaptive processingComputer scienceJammingAdaptive filterSignal processingA priori and a posterioriRadarAlgorithmMoving target indicationFilter (signal processing)Doppler effectComputer visionConstant false alarm rateArtificial intelligenceInterference (communication)Continuous-wave radarRadar imagingTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several space-time adaptive processing algorithms have been proposed to detect weak targets in the presence of strong interference, especially clutter and jamming. Except for displaced phase center array (DPCA) processing, radar signal processing algorithms ignore the fact that the location of the clutter ridge in angle-Doppler space is known, given the platform speed and direction. This paper introduces our attempt to exploit this a priori knowledge in conjunction with the joint domain localized processing algorithm. Using a two-dimensional filter, clutter is rejected in a first, non-adaptive stage, followed by adaptive processing in the angle-Doppler domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207