MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118313093 · doi:10.1109/pes.2007.386188

Managing Ontario IESO Network Model and Its Impact

2007· article· en· W2118313093 on OpenAlexaffabout
B. Danai, Bill Pettitt, Hardeep Kandola, Enamul Haq

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsIndependent Electricity System Operator
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork modelComputer scienceData modelingNetwork information systemNetwork management stationNetwork management applicationElement management systemNetwork simulationData model (GIS)ElectricityPresentation (obstetrics)Network architectureComputer networkDatabaseEngineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation outlines the experience of the IESO in managing the Ontario Network Model. The IESO existing processes for gathering the network data from the market participant, validating the data, building the network model, and loading the network model into the energy management system (EMS) and market information system (MIS) are first outlined. Next the available tools for the network model data validation are presented and finally the impact of the network model on the operation as well as the electricity market is discussed. In conclusion, some desired tool features in managing the network model are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.005
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Power Engineering Society General MeetingSame topicPower Systems and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207