La raison d’être de l’engagement professionnel chez des enseignantes du primaire selon une perspective existentielle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article fait état des résultats d’une recherche sur le processus de développement et de maintien de l’engagement professionnel chez des enseignantes du primaire. La recherche s’est appuyée sur le postulat que toute personne a besoin de donner un sens à sa vie et que ce sens peut se trouver par l’engagement dans un travail signifiant, en l’occurrence l’enseignement. L’analyse des données recueillies lors des entretiens réalisés auprès de douze enseignantes a rendu possible l’établissement d’une théorie ancrée. Ce texte portera sur les motivations existentielles des enseignantes qui ont participé à cette recherche à s’engager dans la profession, soit la construction du soi, le dévouement à l’autre et la contribution sociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.024 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".