MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118330895 · doi:10.1109/ccece.1995.526621

Modelling and parameter identification of an alternator of the LG3 power station taking account of magnetic saturation

2002· article· en· W2118330895 on OpenAlexaffabout
Antoine Tahan, Innocent Kamwa, B. Paiement, Jules Simo

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnetic Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlternatorSaturation (graph theory)InductorMagnetic circuitEquivalent circuitControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemEngineeringMagnetic fluxElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Electronic engineeringPhysicsComputer scienceMagnetic fieldMagnetMathematicsVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 202 MW alternator at the Quebec LG3 station is modelled by means of a structure of generalised equivalent circuits. The type of test used is the response to a disturbance of the order of 15% injected into the inductor in normal operation. To model the magnetic saturation in the direct axis, actual open-circuit test measurements are utilised. The saturation factor method is used in the nonlinear model of the machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMagnetic Properties and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207