MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118381108 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv376

The JCMT Gould Belt Survey: first results from the SCUBA-2 observations of the Ophiuchus molecular cloud and a virial analysis of its prestellar core population

2015· article· en· W2118381108 on OpenAlexaff
Kate Pattle, D. Ward–Thompson, J. M. Kirk, G. J. White, E. Drabek-Maunder, Jane Buckle, S. F. Beaulieu, David Berry, H. Broekhoven-Fiene, M. J. Currie, Michel Fich, J. Hatchell, Helen Kirk, Tim Jenness, Doug Johnstone, J. C. Mottram, D. Nutter, J. E. Pineda, C. Quinn, C. Salji, S. Tisi, S. Walker-Smith, James Di Francesco, M. R. Hogerheijde, Ph. André, Pierre Bastien, D. Bresnahan, H. M. Butner, Michael Chun-Yuan Chen, A. Chrysostomou, Simon Coudé, C. J. Davis, A. Duarte-Cabral, Jason Fiege, Per Friberg, Rachel Friesen, G. A. Fuller, Sarah Graves, J. S. Greaves, J. Gregson, M. J. Griffin, W. S. Holland, G. Joncas, L. B. G. Knee, V. Könyves, Steve Mairs, K. A. Marsh, Brenda C. Matthews, G. H. Moriarty‐Schieven, J. I. Rawlings, John Richer, D. Robertson, Erik Rosolowsky, D. Rumble, Sarah Sadavoy, L. Spinoglio, H. Thomas, N. F. H. Tothill, S. Viti, J. G. A. Wouterloot, J. Yates, Ming Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of AlbertaUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalUniversity of VictoriaHerzberg Institute of AstrophysicsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersScience and Technology Facilities Council
KeywordsOphiuchusPhysicsJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopeAstrophysicsProtostarMolecular cloudVirial massVirial theoremPopulationStar formationAstronomyStarsGalaxy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present the first observations of the Ophiuchus molecular cloud performed as part of the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope (JCMT) Gould Belt Survey (GBS) with the SCUBA-2 instrument. We demonstrate methods for combining these data with previous HARP CO, Herschel, and IRAM N2H+ observations in order to accurately quantify the properties of the SCUBA-2 sources in Ophiuchus. We produce a catalogue of all of the sources found by SCUBA-2. We separate these into protostars and starless cores. We list all of the starless cores and perform a full virial analysis, including external pressure. This is the first time that external pressure has been included in this level of detail. We find that the majority of our cores are either bound or virialized. Gravitational energy and external pressure are on average of a similar order of magnitude, but with some variation from region to region. We find that cores in the Oph A region are gravitationally bound prestellar cores, while cores in the Oph C and E regions are pressure-confined. We determine that N2H+ is a good tracer of the bound material of prestellar cores, although we find some evidence for N2H+ freeze-out at the very highest core densities. We find that non-thermal linewidths decrease substantially between the gas traced by C18O and that traced by N2H+, indicating the dissipation of turbulence at higher densities. We find that the critical Bonnor–Ebert stability criterion is not a good indicator of the boundedness of our cores. We detect the pre-brown dwarf candidate Oph B-11 and find a flux density and mass consistent with previous work. We discuss regional variations in the nature of the cores and find further support for our previous hypothesis of a global evolutionary gradient across the cloud from south-west to north-east, indicating sequential star formation across the region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations157
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesFrench-language works237,207