Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenuePhysical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology · 2015
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Social FundInstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareFonds pour la Formation à la Recherche dans l’Industrie et dans l’AgricultureRussian Academy of SciencesQatar National Research FundCenters for Medicare and Medicaid ServicesBoard of the Swiss Federal Institutes of TechnologyIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NuclearePakistan Atomic Energy CommissionLietuvos Mokslų AkademijaCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaUniversidad Autónoma de San Luis PotosíInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesMinistry of Science and Technology, TaiwanNarodowym Centrum NaukiBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMinistry of Education, Science and TechnologyTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuPhysicians' Services Incorporated FoundationJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchNational Science and Technology Development AgencyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Research Foundation of KoreaMinistry of Business, Innovation and EmploymentGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationAgentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en TechnologieEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichCompagnia di San PaoloAustrian Science FundA.G. Leventis FoundationDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftChinese Academy of SciencesBundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und WirtschaftEuropean Regional Development FundCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAcademy of FinlandEesti TeadusagentuurCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorResearch Promotion FoundationFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroU.S. Department of EnergyKanton ZürichFederal Agency of Atomic Energy of the Russian FederationEuropean CommissionFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloMinistarstvo Prosvete, Nauke i Tehnološkog RazvojaHrvatska Zaklada za ZnanostRussian Foundation for Basic ResearchBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeNational Science FoundationDepartamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)Science and Technology Facilities CouncilMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Academy of Sciences of UkraineInstitute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and TechnologyCentro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico NacionalCERNAlexander von Humboldt-StiftungMinisterstvo Školství, Mládeže a TělovýchovySchool of Mathematics, Institute for Research in Fundamental SciencesMinistry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of ChinaDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of IndiaUniversiti MalayaDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaThailand Center of Excellence in PhysicsFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgMinistero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della RicercaSecretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e InnovaciónAlfred P. Sloan FoundationFundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej
KeywordsPhysicsParticle physicsStandard Model (mathematical formulation)MuonLeptonPhysics beyond the Standard ModelBosonMissing energyNeutrinoTransverse massNuclear physicsLarge Hadron ColliderProtonElectron
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexA search for new physics in proton-proton collisions having final states with an electron or muon and missing transverse energy is presented. The analysis uses data collected in 2012 with the CMS detector, at an LHC center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV, and corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 19.7 fb(-1). No significant deviation of the transverse mass distribution of the charged lepton-neutrino system from the standard model prediction is found. Mass exclusion limits of up to 3.28 TeVat 95% confidence level for a W0-boson with the same couplings as that of the standard model W-boson are determined. Results are also derived in the framework of split universal extra dimensions, and exclusion limits on Kaluza-Klein Wd(KK)((2)) states are found. The final state with large missing transverse energy also enables a search for dark matter production with a recoiling W-boson, with limits set on the mass and the production cross section of potential candidates. Finally, limits are established for a model including interference between a left-handed W'-boson and the standard model W-boson and for a compositeness model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.730
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
