MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118405204 · doi:10.1080/00207170500171329

Analysis of sliding modes in the frequency domain

2005· article· en· W2118405204 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Control · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsSNC-Lavalin (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelaySuperposition principleControl theory (sociology)Ideal (ethics)Frequency domainMathematicsVariable (mathematics)Computer scienceMathematical analysisPhysicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A frequency-domain approach to the analysis of real and ideal sliding modes (SM) in single input single output (SISO) systems with linear plants is proposed. The real SM is analysed as a superposition of fast oscillations and slow motions in a relay system. The approach is based on the notion of the locus of a perturbed relay system (LPRS). The proposed LPRS is defined as a characteristic of the response of a linear part to an unequally spaced pulse control of variable frequency in a closed-loop. Formulas for computing the LPRS are derived. It is demonstrated that beside the well know chattering phenomenon, real SM also exhibits a non-ideal disturbance rejection, which can be quantitatively assessed with the use of the proposed approach. An example of the LPRS analysis of a SM system is given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.231

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it