Magnetic relaxations in metallic multilayers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The intrinsic damping mechanism in metals caused by incoherent scattering of itinerant electron-hole pair excitations by phonons and magnons will be reviewed. The unique features of magnetic relaxations in multilayers were studied by ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) using magnetic single, Au–Fe–GaAs(001), and double layer Au–Fe–Au–Fe–GaAs(001) structures prepared by molecular beam epitaxy. The magnetic relaxation in single-layer films is described by the Gilbert damping with no extrinsic contributions to the FMR linewidth. These films provided an excellent opportunity to investigate nonlocal damping. The main result of these studies is that ultrathin Fe films in magnetic double layers acquire an additional interface Gilbert damping. This is in agreement with recent predictions of nonlocal interface damping which is based on the transport of spin angular momentum between the ferromagnetic layers. Measurements of the nonlocal Gilbert damping offer a possibility to carry out quantitative studies of the relaxation torques caused by nonlocal spin momentum transfer. Numerical simulations of magnetization reversal and stationary precession for an applied perpendicular current in Au–Fe–Au–Fe–GaAs(001) multilayers will be shown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".