Surface Chemistry of Monochlorinated and Dichlorinated Benzenes on Si(100)2×1: Comparison Study of Chlorine Content and Isomeric Effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and temperature-programmed desorption (TPD), the room temperature (RT) adsorption and thermal evolution of monochlorobenzene (MCB) and 1,3-dichlorobenzene (1,3-DCB) on Si(100)2x1 have been investigated and compared with that of 1,2-dichlorobenzene (1,2-DCB) reported previously. Like 1,2-DCB, the C 1s features observed at 284.6 (C(1)) and 286.0 eV (C(2)) for both MCB and 1,3-DCB could be attributed to the C-H and C-Cl bonds, respectively. The C(1)/C(2) intensity ratios for MCB (5.0) and 1,3-DCB (2.0) are found to follow the stoichiometric ratios of the C-H to C-Cl bonds for MCB and 1,3-DCB, respectively, indicating that both MCB and 1,3-DCB adsorb on Si(100)2x1 molecularly with negligible C-Cl dissociation at RT, in marked contrast to the partial C-Cl dissociation found for 1,2-DCB. Unlike 1,2-DCB with two discernible Cl 2s features at 270.3 and 271.2 eV, a single Cl 2s feature at 271.2 eV is observed for MCB and 1,3-DCB, in accord with the single local chemical environment for Cl. The TPD results show that MCB undergoes molecular desorption exclusively, similar to that found for benzene. Both molecular desorption and recombinative HCl desorption are found for 1,3-DCB, similar to that for 1,2-DCB. Despite the different Cl contents and relative Cl locations on the benzene ring, both MCB and 1,3-DCB exhibit RT adsorption behavior remarkably similar to that of benzene. To explain the C-Cl dissociation observed for 1,2-DCB, we propose a possible transition state involving the Cl atoms located at more physically compatible positions with the surface Si dimers in order to facilitate the conversion of 1,2-DCB (preferentially over 1,3-DCB) to dissociated products at RT. However, the thermal evolution of 1,3-DCB is closer to that of 1,2-DCB than that of MCB and benzene. The breakage of C-Cl bonds is found to occur at a relatively low temperature of 425 K, which suggests a relatively low activation barrier for the dechlorination of 1,3-DCB adspecies. Calculated energetics for 1,4-DCB on Si(100)2x1 shows that double dechlorination is not as favorable a process as those for 1,2-DCB and 1,3-DCB.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".