Morpholino Antisense Oligonucleotide-Mediated Gene Knockdown During Thymocyte Development Reveals Role for Runx3 Transcription Factor in CD4 Silencing During Development of CD4−/CD8+ Thymocytes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During thymic T cell development, immature CD4(+)/CD8(+) thymocytes develop into either CD4(+)/CD8(-) helper or CD4(-)/CD8(+) CTLs. The molecular mechanisms governing the complex selection and differentiation steps during thymic T cell development are not well understood. Here we developed a novel approach to investigate gene function during thymocyte development. We transfected ex vivo isolated immature thymocytes with gene-specific morpholino antisense oligonucleotides and induced differentiation in cell or organ cultures. A morpholino oligonucleotide specific for CD8alpha strongly reduces CD8 expression. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstrated gene knockdown by morpholino oligonucleotides in primary lymphocytes. Using this approach, we show here that the transcription factor Runx3 is involved in silencing of CD4 expression during CD8 T cell differentiation. Runx3 protein expression appears late in thymocyte differentiation and is confined to mature CD8 single-positive thymocytes, whereas Runx3 mRNA is transcribed in mature CD4 and CD8 thymocytes. Therefore, Runx3 protein expression is regulated at a post-transcriptional level. The knockdown of Runx3 protein expression through morpholino oligonucleotides inhibited the development of CD4(-)/CD8(+) T cells. Instead, mature cells with a CD4(+)/CD8(+) phenotype accumulated. Potential Runx binding sites were identified in the CD4 gene silencer element, which are bound by Runx protein in EMSAs. Mutagenesis of potential Runx binding sites in the CD4 gene silencer abolished silencing activity in a reporter gene assay, indicating that Runx3 is involved in CD4 gene silencing. The experimental approach developed here should be valuable for the functional analysis of other candidate genes in T cell differentiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".