MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118550199

Pyridinium Oxime Compounds as Antimicrobial Agents

2007· article· en· W2118550199 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bradley J. Berger, Marvin H Knodel

Bibliographic record

VenueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntimicrobialPyridiniumMicrobiologyChemistryBacillus anthracisMycobacterium tuberculosisBacillus cereusVirulenceBiologyTuberculosisMedicineBiochemistryBacteriaOrganic chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyridinium oxime compounds have been utilised by a number of military organisations as one of the antidotes for nerve-agent poisoning. In Canada, the preferred compound from this class is HI-6, which has been demonstrated to be tolerated at high doses without significant ill effects. In this study, HI-6 and 15 structural analogues have been examined for their antimicrobial properties against a series of model organisms: Bacillus cereus and B. anthracis Sterue (as models for virulent B. anthracis), Ochrobactrum intermedium (as a model for Brucella spp.), Mycobacterium marinum (as a model for M. tuberculosis), and Crithidia luciliae (as a model for Leishmania spp.). In general, the compounds were found to have little to no antimicrobial effect, with KJD-2-11, a thiourea derivative, being the most active in all the test systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDefense Technical Information Center (DTIC)Same topicPesticide Exposure and ToxicityFrench-language works237,207