La prison en Belgique : de l'institution totale aux droits des détenus ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux types de mutations de la prison contemporaine sont aujourd’hui mis en avant par les recherches françaises et canadiennes: d’une part, ouverture et complexification des rapports de pouvoir, qui remettraient en question la notion d’institution totale; d’autre part, émergence d’un référentiel mêlant reconnaissance des droits, responsabilisation et examen des besoins sous l’angle de la gestion des risques, qui complexifierait notamment l’analyse foucaldienne de la prison disciplinaire. En Belgique, la première mutation se heurte à la dégradation des conditions de détention; par contre, l’apparition de nouveaux problèmes et l’évolution des processus de désaffiliation semblent changer les rapports que le détenu entretient avec la prison. Quant à la seconde mutation, ses signes restent très marginaux et persiste le contraste entre institution totale et discours sur les droits des détenus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".