La prison en Belgique : de l'institution totale aux droits des détenus ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux types de mutations de la prison contemporaine sont aujourd’hui mis en avant par les recherches françaises et canadiennes: d’une part, ouverture et complexification des rapports de pouvoir, qui remettraient en question la notion d’institution totale; d’autre part, émergence d’un référentiel mêlant reconnaissance des droits, responsabilisation et examen des besoins sous l’angle de la gestion des risques, qui complexifierait notamment l’analyse foucaldienne de la prison disciplinaire. En Belgique, la première mutation se heurte à la dégradation des conditions de détention; par contre, l’apparition de nouveaux problèmes et l’évolution des processus de désaffiliation semblent changer les rapports que le détenu entretient avec la prison. Quant à la seconde mutation, ses signes restent très marginaux et persiste le contraste entre institution totale et discours sur les droits des détenus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".