Epithelioid angiomyolipoma: a morphologically distinct variant that mimics a variety of intra-abdominal neoplasms.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This review examines the histopathologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular biologic features of epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML), with an emphasis on the differential diagnosis of intra-abdominal EAML. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma is an uncommon mesenchymal tumor with malignant potential, frequently associated with tuberous sclerosis complex. Histologically, EAML is characterized by sheets or nests of large polygonal epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic or occasionally clear cytoplasm, often with prominent nucleoli, and EAML may include multinucleated and markedly pleomorphic forms. As these tumors share a distinctive perivascular epithelioid cell phenotype, they belong to the PEComa tumor family. Nearly all EAMLs show immunoreactivity for both melanocytic and myoid markers. Ultrastructurally, EAMLs show evidence of melanogenesis by the presence of premelanosomes. Epithelioid angiomyolipoma can pose significant diagnostic challenges as it mimics morphologically a variety of neoplasms including renal cell carcinoma, renal oncocytoma, adrenal cortical neoplasm, epithelioid smooth muscle tumor, epithelioid peripheral nerve sheath tumor, epithelioid gastrointestinal stromal tumor, epithelioid melanoma, hepatoblastoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The variation in immunophenotype in these tumors requires a prudent use of immunohistochemistry, which may occasionally need complementation by electron microscopy to establish the correct diagnosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".