MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QAM Constellation Design for Complex Field Network Coding in Multi-Way Relay Channels

2013· article· en· W2118597021 on OpenAlexaff
Shaham Sharifian, Behnam Hashemitabar, T. Aaron Gulliver

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Wireless Communications Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRelayAdditive white Gaussian noiseLinear network codingQAMPrecodingQuadrature amplitude modulationDemodulationThroughputComputer networkConstellationRelay channelChannel (broadcasting)Constellation diagramElectronic engineeringAlgorithmMIMOTelecommunicationsBit error rateWirelessNetwork packetEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Complex field network coding has been shown to achieve a throughput of 1/2 symbol per user per channel use in a multi-way relay channel. To achieve this throughput, a superimposed combination of user symbols must be distinguishable at the relay. Rectangular QAM constellations are commonly employed in communication systems due to their ease of generation, demodulation, and near optimal performance in AWGN channels. In this paper, an algorithm is presented to provide precoding vectors that guarantee every superposed combination of user symbols at the relay is distinguishable and QAM constellations are received at the relay. The performance in AWGN channels is derived. The algorithm allows users to employ different signal constellations, and also has the flexibility to allow users to join or leave the network at any time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.990

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.148
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Wireless Communications LettersSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207