MK-626, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, does not improve the hyperglycemia or hyperinsulinemia of nonobese diabetic MKR mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors increase circulating levels of incretin hormones, which can enhance insulin secretion and β cell function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of MK-626 (a novel DPP-4 inhibitor) to reduce the hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia of nonobese type 2 diabetic MKR mice. Twelve to 14-week-old hyperglycemic MKR mice were gavaged daily with MK-626 (3 mg/kg body weight) or vehicle (0.5% methyl cellulose (MC)) for 2 weeks. MK-626-treated mice displayed no change in body weight or adverse reactions, suggesting good tolerance of the drug. Fed blood glucose was significantly reduced over the 2-week experiment; however, it was also reduced in the MC group, suggesting an effect of gavage alone. Fed plasma insulin and glucagon levels and glucose tolerance of MK-626-treated mice were similar to those of MC mice. Therefore, treatment with MK-626 did not correct the prolonged hyperglycemia and impaired glucose tolerance of MKR mice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".