Estimation of Evapotranspiration from Bioretention Areas Using Weighing Lysimeters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In moving toward a water balance approach to storm water management and the modeling tools that can support such an approach, it is clear that there are substantial gaps in our knowledge of the groundwater recharge and evapotranspiration (ET) in urban areas. At a microscale, weighing lysimeters can be used to estimate the ET and may also be designed to also allow drainage (groundwater recharge) to be quantified. A weighing lysimeter has been designed and constructed in Guelph, Ont. to quantify the ET and groundwater recharge from a bioretention area. The results at this scale will vary with the urban surroundings, but will nevertheless contribute to the scant information available. The installation of similar systems in various urban micrometeorological conditions will help to build a database of urban ET and recharge. Other approaches, such as the eddy correlation approach for the ET, are also needed to complement microscale measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it