MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118661612 · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/1/9

THE Q/U IMAGING EXPERIMENT INSTRUMENT

2013· article· en· W2118661612 on OpenAlexaff
C. A. Bischoff, Alison Brizius, I. Buder, Y. Chinone, Kieran Cleary, R. N. Dumoulin, A. Kusaka, Raúl A. Monsalve, Sigurd Næss, L. B. Newburgh, G. W. Nixon, R. Reeves, Kendrick M. Smith, K. Vanderlinde, I. K. Wehus, M. Bogdan, Ricardo Bustos, S. Church, Richard Davis, C. Dickinson, H. K. Eriksen, T. Gaier, Joshua Ott Gundersen, M. Hasegawa, M. Hazumi, C. M. Holler, K. M. Huffenberger, William A. Imbriale, K. Ishidoshiro, Michael E. Jones, Pekka Kangaslahti, D. J. Kapner, Charles R. Lawrence, E. M. Leitch, M. Limon, J. J. McMahon, A. Miller, M. Nagai, H. Nguyen, T. J. Pearson, L. Piccirillo, S. J. E. Radford, A. C. S. Readhead, J. L. Richards, D. F. E. Samtleben, M. D. Seiffert, M. C. Shepherd, Suzanne T. Staggs, O. Tajima, K. L. Thompson, R. Williamson, B. Winstein, Edward J. Wollack, Jonathan Zwart

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRadio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCanadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of Toronto
FundersFermilabComisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoOffice of ScienceNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyNorthrop GrummanJet Propulsion LaboratoryAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversitetet i Oslo
KeywordsPolarimeterPhysicsCosmic microwave backgroundSensitivity (control systems)Gravitational waveTelescopeOpticsHigh-electron-mobility transistorPolarization (electrochemistry)CalibrationStokes parametersPolarimetryMicrowaveAstrophysicsTransistorElectronic engineeringAnisotropyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Q/U Imaging ExperimenT (QUIET) is designed to measure polarization in the cosmic microwave background, targeting the imprint of inflationary gravitational waves at large angular scales(∼1°). Between 2008 October and 2010 December, two independent receiver arrays were deployed sequentially on a 1.4 m side-fed Dragonian telescope. The polarimeters that form the focal planes use a compact design based on high electron mobility transistors (HEMTs) that provides simultaneous measurements of the Stokes parameters Q , U , and I in a single module. The 17-element Q -band polarimeter array, with a central frequency of 43.1 GHz, has the best sensitivity (69 μKs 1/2 ) and the lowest instrumental systematic errors ever achieved in this band, contributing to the tensor-to-scalar ratio at r < 0.1. The 84-element W -band polarimeter array has a sensitivity of 87 μKs 1/2 at a central frequency of 94.5 GHz. It has the lowest systematic errors to date, contributing at r < 0.01. The two arrays together cover multipoles in the range ℓ ∼ 25–975. These are the largest HEMT-based arrays deployed to date. This article describes the design, calibration, performance, and sources of systematic error of the instrument.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.092

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicRadio Astronomy Observations and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207