MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Very high temperature (800°C) ohmic contact of Au/Ni<inf>2</inf>Si on n-type polycrystalline silicon carbide aged in air

2011· article· en· W2118683034 on OpenAlexaff
Ronan Larger, Luc G. Fréchette

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOhmic contactSilicon carbideOxidizing agentMaterials scienceSiliconContact resistanceCrystalliteCarbidePolycrystalline siliconAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Electrical engineeringOptoelectronicsMetallurgyChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ohmic and low-resistance electrical contacts on silicon carbide have been demonstrated for the first time up to very high temperature (800°C) in an oxidizing environment. A specific contact resistance of about 2 × 10 <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">-4</sup> Ω.cm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> was achieved after silicidation at 900°C. Long term aging tests in an oxygen atmosphere were performed, demonstrating ohmic behavior up to 1000 h at 550°C and over 4 h at 800°C. The aging mechanism has been explained, suggesting that polycrystalline 3C-SiC is not as stable as expected at very high temperatures, acting as a source for Si out-diffusion. Also, in-situ electrical measurements at very high temperatures in air using the transmission line method (L-TLM) have been achieved demonstrating good performance of the proposed metallization at representative operating conditions for harsh environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207