MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118688197 · doi:10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536497

A mesh hybrid adaptive service discovery protocol (MesHASeDiP): Protocol design and proof of correctness

2008· article· en· W2118688197 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings - IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService discoveryComputer scienceComputer networkScalabilityOverhead (engineering)CorrectnessProtocol (science)Distributed computingRouting protocolService (business)Neighbor Discovery ProtocolService providerRouting (electronic design automation)Internet protocol suiteWeb serviceWorld Wide WebThe InternetDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The characteristics of wireless mesh networks (WMNs) have motivated us in the design of an efficient service discovery protocol that considers the capabilities of such networks. In this paper we propose a novel service discovery technique for WMNs. Our approach reduces the discovery overhead by integrating the discovery information in the routing layer. Based on an adaptively adjusted advertisement zone of service providers, we have combined proactive and reactive service discovery strategies to come up with an efficient hybrid adaptive service discovery protocol for WMNs. Our protocol optimizes the network overhead. We will show that our proposed protocol is scalable and that it outperforms existing service discovery protocols in terms of message overhead.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.821
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it