Architektonisch qualitätvolle Sandwichfassaden für den Büro‐ und Verwaltungsbau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Im Rahmen des interdisziplinären Forschungsvorhabens FOSTA P977 “Architektonisch qualitätvolle Sandwichfassaden“ [5] wurden die Grundlagen einer architektonisch ansprechenden Systembauweise für Fassaden aus Sandwichelementen mit neuartiger Befestigungstechnik gelegt. Durch die Entwicklung geeigneter Verbindungstechniken konnte das große Anwendungspotential der Sandwichbauweise im Geschossbau herausgearbeitet werden. Der vorliegende Beitrag zeigt daher besonders die technisch‐architektonischen Ergebnisse auf, die zur Schaffung von Fassaden im Geschossbau mit hoher architektonischer Qualität und sozio‐kultureller Akzeptanz führen. High quality sandwich‐panel envelope‐systems for office and multi‐storey buildings. As part of the interdisciplinary research project FOSTA P977 “Architecturally high quality Sandwich‐panel Envelope‐systems” [5], the fundamentals of an architecturally appealing prefabricated system for façades of sandwich panels with a new assembly technology was to be developed. Through the development of suitable connection technologies the huge potential of sandwich constructions in multi‐storey buildings could be obtained. The abstract at hand therefore shows especially technical‐architectural results, which lead to the development of envelope systems for office‐ and multi‐storey buildings with high architectural quality and socio‐cultural acceptance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".