MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prácticas de gobierno corporativo en las Asambleas Generales de Accionistas de empresas listadas en Colombia

2014· article· es· W2118781623 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCuadernos de Administración · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicAccounting and Financial Management
Canadian institutionsCytodiagnostics (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este estudio analiza las Asambleas Generales de Accionistas (AGA) bajo el enfoque de gobierno corporativo, caracterizando las asambleas del año 2012 de once empresas colombianas que representan un poco más del 50% del COLCAP. Utilizando la metodología de Apostolides y los lineamientos del Código País, se construyen índices de evaluación respecto al deber ser de las asambleas. Se encuentra que en estas reuniones se desatienden aspectos fundamentales como el proceso de votación, la composición y remuneración de la junta, la revelación de información sobre los candidatos a la junta y la trasmisión de las AGA a través de internet. Por el contrario, se otorga mayor atención a los refrigerios, implementos de oficina y el lugar en el que se desarrolla la reunión.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.544
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it