MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118811211 · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.1993.714312

On-line learning of robot inverse kinematic transformations

2005· article· en· W2118811211 on OpenAlexaff
D.H. Rao, Manas Gupta, P.N. Nikiforuk

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInverse kinematicsComputer scienceKinematicsRobotArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkRobot kinematicsCartesian coordinate systemForward kinematicsScheme (mathematics)Position (finance)RoboticsControl theory (sociology)Computer visionMobile robotMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Because of the learning and adaptive features, the computational, normally feedforward (static) neural networks have been used in robotics, particularly to obtain solutions to inverse kinematics problems. The procedure, in general, employs two modes of operation. The first mode is to train the network off-line, while the second mode achieves the tracking to a desired position within the task-space based on the trained data. However, the objective of this paper is to propose an online learning and adaptive scheme using a dynamic neural network. It is demonstrated in this paper that the proposed scheme, taking the desired Cartesian coordinates as the inputs, determines the robot joint angles and makes the robot reach the desired position, thereby achieving learning and performing actions together. The computer simulations are presented by approximating the human leg as a two-linked robot to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsFrench-language works237,207