Well-posedness of hp-version discontinuous Galerkin methods for fractional diffusion wave equations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We establish the well-posedness of an hp-version time-stepping discontinuous Galerkin method for the numerical solution of fractional superdiffusion evolution problems. In particular, we prove the existence and uniqueness of approximate solutions for generic hp-version finite element spaces featuring nonuniform time steps and variable approximation degrees. We then derive new hp-version error estimates in a nonstandard norm, which are completely explicit in the local discretization and regularity parameters. As a consequence, we show that by employing geometrically refined time steps and linearly increasing approximation orders, exponential rates of convergence in the number of temporal degrees of freedom are achieved for solutions with singular (temporal) behaviour near t=0 caused by the weakly singular kernel. Moreover, we show optimal algebraic convergence rates for h-version approximations on graded meshes. We present a series of numerical tests where we verify experimentally that our theoretical convergence properties also hold true in the stronger L∞ norm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it