MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118831412

NEW EARLY CAMBRIAN OLENELLINE TRILOBITES FROM THE SEKWI FORMATION, MACKENZIE MOUNTAINS, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES, CANADA, AND NEW INSIGHTS INTO OLENELLINID EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY

2009· dissertation· en· W2118831412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
I. Wesley Gapp

Bibliographic record

VenueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas) · 2009
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiogeographyPaleontologyGeographyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The olenellinid trilobites of the Early Cambrian are a diverse clade that has been an ideal group used in phylogenetic analyses. Recently, new specimens from the Sekwi Formation of the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada, were collected to add more material, to help paleontologists to better understand this group. This thesis presents three new species of Bradyfallotaspis and one new species of Nevadia. Further, new specimens of Nevadia ovalis expand the known geographic range for this species, only known previously from a locality in Senora, Mexico. This expansion is unusual for olenellinid trilobites, which generally have very restricted ranges. A phylogenetic analysis of Judomia absita was performed to help ameliorate confusion regarding its generic assignment between Judomia and Paranevadella, providing further support for a close biogeographic relationship between Laurentia and Siberia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKU ScholarWorks (The University of Kansas)Same topicGeological formations and processesFrench-language works237,207