MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118852596 · doi:10.1111/pan.12512

Sevoflurane anesthesia and brain perfusion

2014· article· en· W2118852596 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Anesthesia · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnesthesiaSevofluraneCerebral blood flowCerebral perfusion pressureHypocapniaOxygenationPerfusionTranscranial DopplerPopulationPerfusion scanningCardiologyHypercapnia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE/AIM: To assess the impact of sevoflurane and anesthesia-induced hypotension on brain perfusion in children younger than 6 months. BACKGROUND: Safe lower limit of blood pressure during anesthesia in infant is unclear, and inadequate anesthesia can lead to hypotension, hypocapnia, and low cerebral perfusion. Insufficient cerebral perfusion in infant during anesthesia is an important factor of neurological morbidity. In two previous studies, we assessed the impact of sevoflurane anesthesia on cerebral blood flow (CBF) by transcranial Doppler (TCD) and on brain oxygenation by NIRS, in children ≤2 years. As knowledge about consequences of anesthesia-induced hypotension on cerebral perfusion in children ≤6 months is scarce, we conducted a retrospective analysis to compare the data of CBF and brain oxygenation, in this specific population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data collected from our two previous studies. Baseline values of TCD or NIRS were recorded and then during sevoflurane anesthesia. From a database of 338 patients, we excluded all patients older than 6 months. Then, we compared physiological variables of TCD and NIRS population to ensure that the two groups were comparable. We compared rSO2 c and TCD measurements variation according to MAP value during sevoflurane anesthesia, using anova and Student-Newman-Keuls for posthoc analysis. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty patients were included in the analysis. TCD and NIRS groups were comparable. CBF velocities (CBFV) or rSO2 c reflects a good cerebral perfusion when MAP is above 45 mmHg. When MAP is between 35 and 45 mmHg, CBFV variation reflects a reduction of CBF, but rSO2 c increase is the consequence of a still positive balance between CMRO2 and O2 supply. Below 35 mmHg of MAP during anesthesia, CBFV decrease and rSO2 c variation from baseline is low. For each category of MAP and for the two groups, etCo2 and expired fraction of sevoflurane (FeSevo) were comparable (anova P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In a healthy infant without dehydration, with normal PaCO2 and hemoglobin value, scheduled for short procedures, MAP is a good proxy of cerebral perfusion as we found that CBF assessed by CBFV and rSO2 c decreased proportionally with cerebral perfusion pressure. During 1 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia, maintaining MAP beyond 35 mmHg during anesthesia is probably safe and sufficient. But when MAP decreases below 35 mmHg, CBF decreases and rSO2 c variation from baseline is low despite CMRO2 reduction. In this situation, cerebral metabolic reserve is low and further changes of systemic conditions may be poorly tolerated by the brain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.329
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it