Exploration of Statistical Dependence Between Illness Parameters using the Entropy Correlation Coefficient
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The entropy correlation coefficient (ECC) is a useful tool for measuring statistical dependence between variables. We employed this tool to search for pairs of variables that correlated in the chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) Computational Challenge dataset. Highly related variables are candidates for data reduction, and novel relationships could lead to hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of CFS. METHODS: Data for 130 female participants in the Wichita (KS, USA) clinical study [1] was coded into numerical values. Metric data was grouped using Gaussian mixture models; the number of groups was chosen using Bayesian information content. The pair-wise correlation between all variables was computed using the ECC. Significance was estimated from 1000 iterations of a permutation test and a threshold of 0.01 was used to identify significantly correlated variables. RESULTS: The five dimensions of multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI) were all highly correlated with each other. Seven Short Form (SF)-36 measures, four CFS case-defining symptoms and the Zung self-rating depression scale all correlated with all MFI dimensions. No physiological variables correlate with more than one MFI dimension. MFI, SF-36, CDC symptom inventory, the Zung self-rating depression scale and three Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) measures are highly correlated with CFS disease status. DISCUSSION: Correlations between the five dimensions of MFI are expected since they are measured from the same instrument. The relationship between MFI and Zung depression index has been previously reported. MFI, SF-36, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) symptom inventory are used to classify CFS; it is not surprising that they are correlated with disease status. Only one of the three CANTAB measures that correlate with disease status has been previously found, indicating the ECC identifies relationships not found with other statistical tools. CONCLUSION: The ECC is a useful tool for measuring statistical dependence between variables in clinical and laboratory datasets. The ECC needs to be further studied to gain a better understanding of its meaning for clinical data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it