MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118878183 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001727

Validity of the <i>International Classification of Diseases 10th revision</i> code for hospitalisation with hyponatraemia in elderly patients

2012· article· en· W2118878183 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sonja Gandhi, Salimah Z. Shariff, Jamie L Fleet, Matthew A. Weir, Arsh K. Jain, Amit X. Garg

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareLondon Health Sciences Centre
KeywordsMedicineEmergency departmentDiagnosis codeRetrospective cohort studyPredictive valueInternal medicinePositive predicative valuePredictive value of testsICD-10Emergency medicinePopulationPediatricsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis code for hyponatraemia (E87.1) in two settings: at presentation to the emergency department and at hospital admission. DESIGN: Population-based retrospective validation study. SETTING: Twelve hospitals in Southwestern Ontario, Canada, from 2003 to 2010. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 66 years and older with serum sodium laboratory measurements at presentation to the emergency department (n=64 581) and at hospital admission (n=64 499). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value comparing various ICD-10 diagnostic coding algorithms for hyponatraemia to serum sodium laboratory measurements (reference standard). Median serum sodium values comparing patients who were code positive and code negative for hyponatraemia. RESULTS: The sensitivity of hyponatraemia (defined by a serum sodium ≤132 mmol/l) for the best-performing ICD-10 coding algorithm was 7.5% at presentation to the emergency department (95% CI 7.0% to 8.2%) and 10.6% at hospital admission (95% CI 9.9% to 11.2%). Both specificities were greater than 99%. In the two settings, the positive predictive values were 96.4% (95% CI 94.6% to 97.6%) and 82.3% (95% CI 80.0% to 84.4%), while the negative predictive values were 89.2% (95% CI 89.0% to 89.5%) and 87.1% (95% CI 86.8% to 87.4%). In patients who were code positive for hyponatraemia, the median (IQR) serum sodium measurements were 123 (119-126) mmol/l and 125 (120-130) mmol/l in the two settings. In code negative patients, the measurements were 138 (136-140) mmol/l and 137 (135-139) mmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: The ICD-10 diagnostic code for hyponatraemia differentiates between two groups of patients with distinct serum sodium measurements at both presentation to the emergency department and at hospital admission. However, these codes underestimate the true incidence of hyponatraemia due to low sensitivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicElectrolyte and hormonal disordersFrench-language works237,207