MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118878768 · doi:10.1109/tit.2008.924689

On Information Embedding When Watermarks and Covertexts are Correlated

2008· article· en· W2118878768 on OpenAlexaff
En‐Hua Yang, Wei Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital watermarkingWatermarkEmbeddingChannel (broadcasting)Information hidingComputer scienceAlgorithmSIGNAL (programming language)Information protection policyTheoretical computer scienceMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsComputer securityArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)Computer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<para xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"> In this correspondence, a new digital watermarking scenario is studied, where watermarks and covertexts are correlated with each other. A necessary and sufficient condition is derived under which a watermark is first embedded, and can later be recovered with high probability at the output of a public watermark decoder after the watermarked signal is disturbed by a fixed memoryless attack channel. Interestingly, the condition also implies that the Shannon separation theorem does not hold in this scenario. </para>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.007
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking TechniquesFrench-language works237,207