LA LEY DE SUBCONTRATACIÓN Y LA TUTELA DE LOS DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES DE LOS TRABAJADORES DE SERVICIOS TRANSITORIOS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dictation of Law N 20.123 has again positioned the sub-contracting topic in the Chilean Labor Right with regard to the important transformations that are introduced to the regulation system and the protection of the subordinated work contained in the Labor Code, as well as, for the legal, economic and social consequences that will involve the implementation of this rule. The current research work intends to show a general analysis of the modifications introduced in our labor ordinance by this new legal text, to focus, specifically, in the questions produced by the sub-contracting law about the incidence that fundamental rights of temporary workers have. That way it is searched to be able to determine the way in which these essential guarantees of the human being are projected in the special legal relation of a triangle character derived from the personal service sub-contracting between the temporary service company, the user and the worker. Similarly, it is intended to provide some ideas and solutions about the real possibilities of the jurisdictional protection these fundamental rights might get in case of being injured, in agreement with the provisions of the guardianship procedure incorporated by Law N 20.087.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it