SmartAd: A smart system for effective advertising in online videos
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advertising in online videos is a large and growing market. In this paper, we propose a new approach to match ads with online videos based on the shopping interests of the target audience of videos. The proposed approach increases the relevance of ads to the actual viewers (humans) of videos, which increases the number of users who purchase goods and services offered by the advertisers. This in turn will increase the revenues for advertisers as well as for the video sites as video sites usually charge advertisers based on the number of user clicks on their ads. The proposed approach is different from current approaches used in practice or proposed in the literatures, which most of them try to maximize the relevance of ads to the tags or contents of videos (objects). We conduct a subjective study to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on many videos retrieved from YouTube. Our results show that the proposed approach yields more relevant ads to viewers than the YouTube's approach. We also compare against other approaches proposed in the literature and we show that the new approach outperforms them.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it