Transient caloric restriction in early adulthood hastens disease endpoint in male, but not female, Cu/Zn‐SOD mutant G93A mice
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Long-term caloric restriction (CR) prolongs the lifespan in healthy insects, rodents, and nonhuman primates. We previously reported that long-term CR improves motor performance but hastens clinical onset of disease in an animal model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (G93A mice). G93A mice overexpress the mutant human Cu/Zn-SOD gene and show progressive lower motor neuron weakness and increased oxidative stress. To study short-term (15 days) CR in the same animal model, we investigated the effect of transient caloric restriction (TCR) on paw grip endurance, clinical onset, disease progression (time from clinical onset to endpoint), and lifespan. Starting at age 40 days, 32 separately caged G93A mice were randomly divided into two groups: ad libitum (AL, n = 17; 10 females, 7 males) and TCR (n = 15; 6 females, 9 males) with a diet equal to 60% of AL. When the TCR mice lost 30% of their weight they were offered food AL until endpoint, otherwise all TCR mice were provided food AL from age 55 days until endpoint (i.e., range of TCR = 13-15 days). Paw grip endurance started to decrease significantly at age 96 days compared with baseline values for all the groups. TCR males reached clinical onset 5 days sooner than TCR females. Disease progression was 8 days faster in TCR mice than AL mice and 6 days faster in male mice than female mice. The probability of survival was significantly different between the groups, with the TCR males having a faster rate of reaching endpoint than TCR females, AL males, and AL females. We conclude that TCR hastens clinical onset of disease and shortens the lifespan in male, but not female, G93A mice. Moreover, TCR hastens progress of disease but has no effect on paw grip endurance. The female sex is protective against the detrimental effects of short-term CR in G93A mice. Assuming we can extrapolate these results to humans, short-term CR should be avoided in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, especially men.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".