Electrochemical reduction of N,N′-thiobisphthalimide and N,N′-dithiobisphthalimide: ejection of diatomic sulfur through an autocatalytic mechanism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical reduction of N,N'-dithiobisphthalimide and N,N'-thiobisphthalimide is investigated using electrochemical techniques and theoretical calculations. The results are rationalized using adequate electron transfer theories. The reduction leads to the ejection of diatomic sulfur and involves an interesting autocatalytic mechanism. This mechanism is dependent on the concentration of the initial compound and the cyclic voltammetric scan rate. The starting material is reduced both at the electrode and through homogeneous electron transfer from the produced sulfur. The initial electron transfer follows a stepwise mechanism involving the formation of the corresponding radical anion. This is supported by both the electrochemical data and the theoretical calculation results. The radical anion of the N,N'-dithiobisphthalimide dissociates through cleavage of the N-S chemical bond and not the S-S chemical bond. Application of the extension of the dissociative electron transfer theory to the dissociation of radical anions shows that the N-S chemical bond dissociates despite being stronger than the S-S chemical bond. This is due to the large difference in the oxidation potentials of the two potential anions (the phthalimidyl anion and the phthalimidyl thiyl anion). The electrochemical reduction of N,N'-thiobisphthalimide involves the intermediate formation of N,N'-dithiobisphthalimide and hence the autocatalytic process is less efficient.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".