Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Adult Philadelphia-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Era of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in first complete remission (CR1) is considered the standard of care, and the only established therapy that offers a possibility of cure for patients with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Unfortunately, a number of patients, with suitable HLA-matched donors, are unable to receive an allograft because they fail to respond, or relapse shortly after induction chemotherapy. Incorporating imatinib during the induction/consolidation phase is facilitating a higher number of potentially curative allografts by improving both remission rates and/or the durability of responses in patients with Ph+ ALL. Imatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors are also improving outcomes in elderly patients with Ph+ ALL, ineligible for allografting, when combined with glucocorticoids, and/or conventional chemotherapy. The addition of imatinib or other tyrosine kinase inhibitors to the therapeutic armamentarium of Ph+ ALL is reshaping the treatment algorithm and improving prognosis of this dreadful disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".