MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2119064581

The optimal searcher path problem with a visibility criterion in discrete time and space

2009· article· en· W2119064581 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Morin, Irène Abi‐Zeid, Pascal Lang, Luc Lamontagne, Patrick Maupin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Search Problems
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development CanadaUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematical optimizationPath (computing)VisibilityDiscretizationMotion planningAny-angle path planningComputer scienceGridObject (grammar)Integer programmingMathematicsAlgorithmTopology (electrical circuits)Artificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract – In this paper, the problem of path planning for a ground search unit looking for an object of unknown location is considered. As in the classical optimal searcher path problem, the probability of finding the search object is the main criterion of optimality and the search unit is constrained by the environment topology that influences its choices for a navigable path as well as its detection capabilities. This paper proposes an extension to the classical optimal searcher path problem in discrete time and space by integrating inter-region visibility as an additional criterion. This new formulation allows a refinement in the discretization of the space in which a ground search unit evolves. A general mixed-integer programming model is proposed, and experimental results with a moving object in grid environments are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Search ProblemsFrench-language works237,207