MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Molecular cloning and transcriptional activation of lysozyme‐encoding cDNAs in the mosquito <i>Aedes aegypti</i>

2005· article· en· W2119070420 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInsect Molecular Biology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicInvertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsAedes aegyptiBiologyLysozymeCloning (programming)Hemolymphgenomic DNAMidgutAedesIntronGeneImmune systemGeneticsMolecular biologyBiochemistryLarvaVirologyDengue feverBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lysozymes are enzymes characterized by their ability to break down bacterial cell walls. In insects certain lysozymes are only found in the midgut, whereas others are only found in the haemolymph and fat body after immune challenge. We identified two lysozyme-encoding cDNAs from Aedes aegypti. Both deduced protein sequences are basic in nature, contain 148 amino acids including eight highly conserved cysteine residues, and their genomic sequences contain a single intron. Transcriptional profiles indicated that the predominant form is constitutively expressed and up-regulated upon immune challenge and blood feeding in adult mosquitoes. The second form is expressed during early developmental stages, larvae and pupae, and at low levels in adults after immune challenge. Lysozymes in Aedes aegypti play both roles, defined by the spatial and temporal regulation of their expression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it