A pitch extraction algorithm in noise based on temporal and spectral representations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a new algorithm for pitch extraction from noisy speech signals based on both temporal and spectral representations is presented. We derive a harmonic sinusoidal correlation (HSC) model of clean speech as a temporal representation. Given only a noisy speech frame, a noise-robust least-squares minimization technique is proposed to acquire the parameters of the HSC model which are directly employed for the accurate estimation of a pitch-harmonic (PH). Exploiting the extracted PH and based on a spectral representation which is an enhanced spectrum in the discrete cosine transform domain, a two-fold criterion is developed in order to achieve the true consecutive number corresponding to PH that is finally adopted for pitch detection in the presence of noise. Simulation results using the Keele pitch extraction reference database manifest that combining the multi cues obtained from the temporal as well as spectral representations, the proposed algorithm is able to achieve a superior efficacy in comparison to some of the existing methods from high to very low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it