MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Evaluation using multilayer perception neural networks: a case study of undulatory median fin swimming in the knifefish <i>Xenomystus nigri</i>

2007· article· en· W2119102187 on OpenAlexaff
J. Li, K. H. S. Chan, Robert W. Blake, Pui–Yan Kwok

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fish Biology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinPropulsionThrustArtificial neural networkFish finBiologyUnderwaterPerceptionBiomimeticsArtificial intelligenceMarine engineeringComputer scienceFish <Actinopterygii>FisheryEngineeringAerospace engineeringOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, artificial intelligence, namely multilayer perception neural networks (MLP‐NN), was employed to predict the hydrodynamic performance of undulatory median fin propulsion in Xenomystus nigri . Good agreement was found between MLP‐NN predictions and actual mean thrust and power values calculated from elongated‐body theory. MLP‐NN has the ability to be a predictive tool for autonomous underwater vehicle design and hydrodynamic performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.719
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fish BiologySame topicBiomimetic flight and propulsion mechanismsFrench-language works237,207